Last edited by Shat
Sunday, July 12, 2020 | History

2 edition of Why not the NIV? found in the catalog.

Why not the NIV?

G. R. Guile

Why not the NIV?

reasons why the New International Version is unreliable

by G. R. Guile

  • 180 Want to read
  • 35 Currently reading

Published by Penfold Book and Bible House in Bicester .
Written in English


Edition Notes

First published, 1993.

Statementby G.R. Guile.
The Physical Object
Paginationvi,42p. ;
Number of Pages42
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL15947850M

Q: # Why is the NIV Bible missing some verses? By: Steve Shirley A: The NIV has 16 "missing" verses, all in the New Testament. I put "missing" in parenthesis because many scholars would say that they aren't "missing" at all, but rather, the Bibles that have them (like the KJV) "added" them when they never should have been included in the Bible in the first place. 9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural.

The top-selling Bible across the country is the New International Version (NIV). According to the Bookstore Journal (September, ), the King James is second, followed by the New King James, with The Living Bible in fourth place, the New American Standard in sixth, and the New Revised Standard Version in tenth. One recent full-page aggressive advertisement in a magazine pictures Jesus. 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus The NIV Application Commentary (Series) Walter L. Liefeld Author ().

Only in the book of Acts did the NIV decide to use Roman time when rendering "the third hour," "the sixth hour," etc. The NIV retained the literal language in the four gospels (including one book written by Luke but not his other!). How is a reader to make sense of this? Again, the NIV's translation, "child's father," is a more correct translation of the Greek than the KJV's translation, "Joseph." There is not some conspiracy by whoever wrote the NIV, nor by the Catholic Church, in wanting to mislead people into thinking that Joseph was Jesus' biological father.


Share this book
You might also like
Diet and disease during the first Industrial Revolution

Diet and disease during the first Industrial Revolution

The Complete Brothers Grimm Fairy Tales [Illustrated]

The Complete Brothers Grimm Fairy Tales [Illustrated]

Development of polyelectrolyte complexes as thromboresistant materials for use in components of artificial hearts.

Development of polyelectrolyte complexes as thromboresistant materials for use in components of artificial hearts.

Magruders American Government

Magruders American Government

Invitation to linguistics

Invitation to linguistics

Tenth Air Force story ... in World War II

Tenth Air Force story ... in World War II

Amalgamation

Amalgamation

Infertility

Infertility

Ballston Springs

Ballston Springs

John Carter on private presses.

John Carter on private presses.

How to franchise your business

How to franchise your business

Securities Regulation 1999

Securities Regulation 1999

Illustrated key to caterpillars on corn

Illustrated key to caterpillars on corn

Why not the NIV? by G. R. Guile Download PDF EPUB FB2

The NIV text may be quoted in any form (written, visual, electronic or audio), up to and inclusive of five hundred () verses without express written permission of the publisher, providing the verses do not amount to a complete book of the Bible nor do the verses quoted account for twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the total text of the.

In Philippians of the NIV Jesus is no longer EQUAL with God; but rather, could not grasp equality with God. The NIV is Wicked. Vile. Blasphemy. Why would anyone use the NIV. Satan's Latest Gimmick “Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of.

When comparing the NIV with the King James Version (KJV), it would seem that there are some verses “missing” in the NIV (and other trusted translations such as the CEV, CSB, ESV, GNB, HCSB, NET, NLT, etc.). Actually, that is not the case. Inthe translators of the KJV used the best resources available to them at that time.

New International Version Below is a list of the books of the ng on a book of the Bible will show you a list of all the chapters of that book.

12 Unspoken Reasons Why You Should Never Use the New. The NIV is not a book I read, so I have never wondered why there are any missing verses. If there are missing verses in any Bible, one would have to ask, compared to what. For any text to be missing from a book of any sort, a previous publication.

24 “Why does the Almighty not set times for judgment. (Why must those who know him look in vain for such days. (2 There are those who move boundary stones; they pasture flocks they have stolen. (3 They drive away the orphan’s donkey and take the widow’s ox in pledge.

(4 They thrust the needy from the path and force all the poor of the land into hiding. It’s true that there are differences between the King James Bible and the NIV (New International Version) Bible, but parts of this rumor are misleading or disputed.

Claims that the NIV Bible has words, or 45 complete verses, have been around for decades. They’re not the result of a “new” edition released by HarperCollins. Most Christians do not seem to have much difficulty accepting this translation as one of quality, and many celebrate the gender-neutrality of the NIV.

After releasing the NIV, the Zondervan Publishing House discontinued both the NIV and the TNIV. The New International Version of the Bible is now exclusively the NIV.

The NIV does not include the second half of the verse which is intended to balance and give perspective to the first half. Romans Read online at BibleGateway.

KJV NIV: But why dost thou judge thy brother. or why dost thou set at nought thy brother. for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. You, then, why do you judge. We have not even addressed the later version(s) of the NIV--gone hog wild crazy (e.g., we have an old article on the "Today's New International Version" gender inclusivity and a article on the NIV entitled, "The NIV-- TNIV gender-inclusivity was, was not, and now is in the NIV") HOG WILD.

Why aren't church people warned. It is true, however, that not everyone has been pleased with changes made to the NIV in recent years, and some have felt they were made for financial reasons. Published 13 July By. Why do KJV only Christians believe that those who read the NIV are stupid, that somehow they don't know that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Son of God, the second person of the Godhead, part of the Trinity, that no man can be saved outside belief in the atoning work of Jesus Christ and his shed blood for the remission of our sins.

The missing books you refer to in the KJV are most likely the apocryphal books which are generally not found in any Protestant translation (NASB, NAS, NIV, RSV, etc.).

The Protestant church generally does not believe these books are inspired and therefore canonical, that is authoritative and deserving to be a part of the Bible as the Word of God. source. Not to mention, if you are writing articles constantly, in time you (and your business) will gain name recognition which may be very urgent.

Well, why not consider if Intending to tell you both appear to be to a point are telling the truth. In order to create things clear to you, let me define first what is SEO. And so the Committee on Bible Translation (CBT), the self-governing body responsible for the NIV, was born.

A Painstaking Translation Process. To ensure maximum accuracy and readability, the NIV went through perhaps the most rigorous translation process in history. First, each book of the Bible was assigned to a translation team consisting of. Was the New International Version (NIV) translation process corrupted by a secular agenda for profit or political correctness.

Absolutely not. No other Bible translation has followed such a rigorous, careful process to ensure accuracy and reliability. The text of the NIV is entrusted to an independent, self-governing body of evangelical Bible scholars called the Committee on Bible Translation.

Listener's Audio Bible - New International Version, NIV: New Testament Brimming with both encouragement and truth, best-selling author Max Lucado's Fear Not Promise Book addresses six major topics of fear and how we can put an end to its effects.

While fear corrodes our confidence, faith in God's love for us always restores hope. In the NIV, it is Jesus Christ (the Morning Star) and not Satan that rebelled against God and was cast out of heaven.

That is outright blasphemy. Satan has pulled off quite a disappearing act. Not only has he been removed from the text, Jesus Christ has been inserted in his place.

The NIV Application Series in the OT contains 22 volumes and includes most of the Pentateuch, the historical books, wisdom/poetic writings, and the prophets. The NIV Application Series is complete in the NT. This series is based on the NIV.

In addition to the NIV, the CanRC has judged as acceptable for use in the churches (at Synod Smithers ) the ESV, the NKJV and the New American Standard Bible (NASB). The Committee for Bible Translation (CBT) for the CanRC, in its Interim Report of December does not recommend that the NIV be used in the churches.

The NIV deviates too much from the text That's a valid concern and one that we have, as well. If you wish to reject the NIV for this reason, we have no argument. It's not the King James Version If you're loyal to the KJV, we're also not going to argue — in part because it's often more of a sentimental choice than a historically.

Now, mattdabbs, why do you not answer the question concerning the NIV on the quotation from ISAIAH were the word Lucifer has been replaced with Morning Star and then in Revelations Jesus explicitly states that he is the Morning Star.